Pressure Builds
on Deficit Panel to eGo Big,f Beyond Its Mandate, in
Cuts
Published: September 12, 2011 - New York Times
WASHINGTON — Led by President
Obama, pressure is building on the new Congressional committee on deficit
reduction to ggo bigh — beyond its mandate to shave as much as $1.5 trillion
from budget shortfalls over 10 years — even as doubts remain about the panelfs
ability to find enough bipartisan agreement to meet even the original goal.
A group of at least 57 prominent business executives and former government
officials have signed a petition in support of a greater deficit reduction,
which they are to release at a news conference on Monday. Among them are former
treasury secretaries, budget directors and economic advisers to eight presidents
from Richard M. Nixon to Mr. Obama; former Congressional leaders; and executives
of top companies.
Their letter reflects a broad sense of urgency in both parties, and among
economists and businesses, that the nation must put in place long-range measures
to shrink future deficits. At current spending levels, those deficits are
expected to balloon over the next decade as the population ages and as health
care costs rise.
The letter does not call for short-term job-creation measures like the tax
cuts and infrastructure spending Mr.
Obama proposed last week, which would add to deficits initially. Even so,
many of the signers, liberals and conservatives, have called for such steps.
The petition does include what has fast become a catchphrase for those who
believe Congress is thinking too small. gWe urge you to ego big,f h they wrote,
gand develop a large-scale debt-reduction package sufficient to stabilize the
debt as a share of the economy.h
Generally that level is estimated at $4 trillion in deficit reductions over
the decade, savings that would build in later years. Because Congress and Mr.
Obama already agreed last month to nearly $1 trillion in reductions in so-called
discretionary spending for social and military programs, the special committee
would have to find more than $3 trillion more to meet that goal — double its
mandate for $1.2 trillion to $1.5 trillion, written into the August
deficit-reduction deal.
Mr. Obama has called for a goal of at least $2 trillion, though the extra
savings would mostly offset the up-front costs of his new $447 billion stimulus
plan.
A higher deficit-reduction goal would increase pressure on both parties to
address the two main drivers of projected high debt: the rapid growth of
spending for the Medicare
and Medicaid
programs and an inefficient tax system unable to keep pace. That would test
Republicansf opposition to raising any tax revenues from high-income individuals
and corporations, and would challenge Congressional Democrats to agree to more
savings from entitlement programs than they would like.
Yet it is the partiesf differences on taxes and government health care
benefits that have many in the White House, Congress and outside groups
skeptical that the 12-member panel, which is split evenly between Republicans
and Democrats and House and Senate members, can reach agreement even on the
lesser goal.
Several signers of the letter said they had no illusions that their appeal
alone would persuade many lawmakers, especially Republicans, to compromise. And
while Congressional Democratic leaders have indicated that they would follow Mr.
Obama in backing a compromise, many Democrats fear that doing so would undercut
their ability to attack Republicans in 2012 for their proposals to remake and
shrink Medicare and Medicaid.
The threshold of $4 trillion was first suggested in December by a majority of
the fiscal panel that Mr. Obama established in 2010, led by Alan K. Simpson, a
former Senate Republican leader, and Erskine B. Bowles, a former chief of staff
to President Bill Clinton. Both men signed the letter.
gThat is not a number that people just made up because the No. 4 bus just
drove by,h Mr. Bowles said in an interview. gItfs the minimum amount we need to
do in order to stabilize the debt and put it on a downward path as a percent of
G.D.P.h
The public debt amounted to 62 percent of the nationfs gross domestic product
last year and is projected to reach 77 percent of economic output by 2021.
Other signers include George P. Schultz, a former secretary of labor,
treasury and state; Martin Feldstein and Murray L. Weidenbaum, top economic
advisers to President Ronald Reagan; and the first chairman of Mr. Obamafs
Council of Economic Advisers, Christina D. Romer.
The businesspeople include David M. Cote, the chairman of Honeywell
International and a Republican on the Bowles-Simpson commission, and Marne
Obernauer Jr., chairman of the Beverage Distributors Company and an owner of the
Colorado Rockies baseball team.
The letter writers did not recommend how to reduce deficits, acknowledging
that they had gdifferences of opinion.h But their letter, which was organized by
the Committee for a Responsible
Federal Budget at the New
America Foundation, a centrist research group, makes clear that the solution
should include spending and tax changes.
gWe believe that a go-big approach that goes well beyond the $1.5 trillion
deficit reduction goalh should include gmajor reforms of entitlement programs
and the tax code,h they wrote.
Republican leaders have not joined Mr. Obama in seeking a higher goal. After
a Rose Garden event on Monday, Mr. Obama will send Congress his jobs bill and
long-term deficit cuts to offset its cost; next week he will propose another
$1.5 trillion in deficit reductions to the committee.
gWefre certainly open to hearing the presidentfs ideas,h said Michael Steel,
a spokesman for Speaker John A. Boehner.
The Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, said last week:
gIfm not going to prejudge what the joint
committee might do. It has a broad array of options. But its goal,
obviously, is to do something significant about deficit reduction with a floor
of between $1.2 trillion and $1.5 trillion over 10 years.h
He added, gWefll see whether they can even go beyond that.h
The committee is to report by Nov. 23, and Congress must hold an up-or-down
vote by Dec. 23.
gIs it 50-50 that theyfll do something big and bold? No,h Mr. Bowles said.
gBut I think therefs a real chance. There are a lot of people on that committee,
Republicans and Democrats, that Ifve talked to personally that want to do
something big.h